80斤藏獒跳楼砸瘫过路老师 法庭一审判赔71万元

李英俊律师

<P  align=center><B ><FONT face="Times New Roman">80</FONT></B><B >斤藏獒跳楼砸瘫过路老师</B><B ><FONT face="Times New Roman"> </FONT></B><B >法庭一审判赔</B><B ><FONT face="Times New Roman">71</FONT></B><B >万元</B><B ><o:p></o:p></B></P>
<P ><o:p><FONT face="Times New Roman"> </FONT></o:p></P>
<P ><FONT face="Times New Roman">    </FONT>发生在杨家坪直港大道的藏獒跳楼砸瘫老师案<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>原告索赔<FONT face="Times New Roman">153</FONT>万多元<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>近日一审判决有了结果。记者昨日从九龙坡区法院获悉<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>受害人我市某重点中学老师张某<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>获赔<FONT face="Times New Roman">71</FONT>万多元。<FONT face="Times New Roman"> <o:p></o:p></FONT></P>
<P ><o:p><FONT face="Times New Roman"> </FONT></o:p></P>
<P >　　<B >争议焦点</B><B ><o:p></o:p></B></P>
<P ><B ><FONT face="Times New Roman">    </FONT></B><B >护理费相差</B><B ><FONT face="Times New Roman">50</FONT></B><B >多万元</B><B ><o:p></o:p></B></P>
<P ><o:p><FONT face="Times New Roman"> </FONT></o:p></P>
<P ><FONT face="Times New Roman">    </FONT>在庭审中<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>双方争议的焦点集中在原告张老师的护理费和精神损失费上。原告方在起诉中称<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>原告因为系一级伤残<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>下半生要靠轮椅生活。提出的护理费达到<FONT face="Times New Roman">76</FONT>万多元。“他们要求太高。”被告方的委托代理人<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>重庆合益律师事务所律师夏华平称<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>完全不能接受。<FONT face="Times New Roman"> <o:p></o:p></FONT></P>
<P ><FONT face="Times New Roman">    </FONT>法院一审后认为<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>原告<st1:chsdate w:st="on" IsROCDate="False" IsLunarDate="False" Day="3" Month="6" Year="2007"><FONT face="Times New Roman">2007</FONT>年<FONT face="Times New Roman">6</FONT>月<FONT face="Times New Roman">3</FONT>日</st1:chsdate>入院<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>同年<FONT face="Times New Roman">7</FONT>月<FONT face="Times New Roman">27</FONT>日出院<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>共住院<FONT face="Times New Roman">54</FONT>天<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>住院期间<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>医疗机构未明确需两人护理。结合原告的伤情<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>在原告出院后至对护理程序进行鉴定期间<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>原告仍需要护理。而在<FONT face="Times New Roman">2007</FONT>年公布的重庆劳动力市场工资指导价位中<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>护理人员工资是<FONT face="Times New Roman">500-1000</FONT>元<FONT face="Times New Roman">/</FONT>月。法院判决护理费用共计<FONT face="Times New Roman">18</FONT>万<FONT face="Times New Roman">8</FONT>千多元。记者看到<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>这与原告提出的民事诉讼请求中<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>护理费的赔偿相差达到了<FONT face="Times New Roman">50</FONT>多万元。<FONT face="Times New Roman"> <o:p></o:p></FONT></P>
<P ><FONT face="Times New Roman">    </FONT>而双方争议的另一个焦点还在精神损失赔偿上<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>原告方提出的精神损失赔偿达到<FONT face="Times New Roman">30</FONT>万元。夏华平同样认为<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>我市最高精神赔偿损失不过<FONT face="Times New Roman">10</FONT>万元<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>这种赔偿要求太高了。<FONT face="Times New Roman"> <o:p></o:p></FONT></P>
<P ><FONT face="Times New Roman">    </FONT>法院一审判决认为<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>原告系市内重点中学在职老师<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>事故的发生造成原告一级伤残<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>给原告确实造成了较大的精神损害<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>但原告的请求过高<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>法院酌情主张<FONT face="Times New Roman">5</FONT>万元。<FONT face="Times New Roman"> <o:p></o:p></FONT></P>
<P ><o:p><FONT face="Times New Roman"> </FONT></o:p></P>
<P ><B >两点异议</B><B ><o:p></o:p></B></P>
<P ><B >被告律师可能会上诉</B><B ><o:p></o:p></B></P>
<P ><B ><o:p><FONT face="Times New Roman"> </FONT></o:p></B></P>
<P ><FONT face="Times New Roman">    </FONT>对于法院的一审判决<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>夏华平称有两点异议：<o:p></o:p></P>
<P ><FONT face="Times New Roman">    </FONT>一是对于残疾赔偿金的赔偿有异议<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>法院是按照<FONT face="Times New Roman">2007</FONT>年底城镇居民人均可支配收入相关标准计算<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>但是在受伤之时<FONT face="Times New Roman">,07</FONT>年的标准尚未公布<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>应该按照<FONT face="Times New Roman">2006</FONT>年度城镇居民人均可支配收入相关标准计算。<FONT face="Times New Roman"> <o:p></o:p></FONT></P>
<P >二是精神损害赔偿金上<FONT face="Times New Roman">,5</FONT>万元的赔偿标准也过高。“如果不服判决<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>在判决书送达之日起<FONT face="Times New Roman">15</FONT>日内<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>可以上诉。”夏华平称<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>将征求当事人的意见<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>仔细权衡后<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>在<st1:chsdate w:st="on" IsROCDate="False" IsLunarDate="False" Day="18" Month="9" Year="2008"><FONT face="Times New Roman">9</FONT>月<FONT face="Times New Roman">18</FONT>日</st1:chsdate>最后的上诉期限到来前<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>做出是否上诉的决定。夏华平又表示<FONT face="Times New Roman">,</FONT>“上诉的可能性很大。”<o:p></o:p></P>
<P ><o:p><FONT face="Times New Roman"> </FONT></o:p></P>
<P >来源：华龙网<FONT face="Times New Roman">  </FONT>发布时间：<st1:chsdate w:st="on" IsROCDate="False" IsLunarDate="False" Day="11" Month="9" Year="2008"><FONT face="Times New Roman">2008-09-11</FONT></st1:chsdate><o:p></o:p></P>

mmhgj

<p>好不幸</p>